It's my second time taking Biblical Interpretation class under the same
teacher haha.. Don't think many people have had that experience! Nevertheless,
I felt that I have learnt so much during these 33 hours of class squashed into
one and a half weeks.. (few more hours more to go!)
The first thing that I caught was the danger of reading the word with the
tinted lenses of our presuppositions. (Billings, J. Todd, The Word of God for
the People of God) It is dangerous because we will unwittingly inject our own
preconceived notions into the text, and derive meanings that neither can be
found from the text nor what the author or God intended it to be. For the
majority of Christians, however, this practice is not nearly as fatal, since
most of us derive our theological understandings not from the bible, due to how
little we read it.. sadly. Instead, we come to understand who God is from
basically living life, like how our parents talked about God when we were
young, how we interpret our own life experiences and those around us, how the
pastor in our church portrays God to be. And thus, if we are surrounded by a
community of believers who are strong in their bible, we'll be able to derive a
theological understanding that is accurate too? Unfortunately, the community
who is strong in their word does not come from nowhere. Since the majority of
believers are not strong in their word, there is not only a need to change how
the community views the word of God, but also a need to educate Christians on
how they can study the word so that they can extract its life transforming
power, and it starts with us. Before that happens, the church will be in danger
of being a community that guides each other with our subjective ideas of who
God is.
A corollary of Christians deriving their theological understandings from
experience and the community rather than the word of God directly is the
foundation of their faith becomes easily shaken. When we do not know where in
scripture we can find the promises of God that we cling on to, letting go of
them becomes easy when we begin to doubt if God ever said them. Falsely interpreting
passages as promises of God has an even heftier repercussion, as we live life
we a false sense of who God is, and we question if God is as faithful as He
claims to be as we do not see the fulfilment of promises He never gave.
Reading the word with our preconceived notions is also dangerous because we
inevitably limit its meaning and it disallows us from experiencing the fullness
of its message. This, I feel could be a reason why people do not see the need
the need to read the scripture. It either agrees with their pre-conceived
notions, thus does not adding much value to them, or the meaning seems so
obscure that they decide to skip over it altogether, since something so
mysterious or abstract probably would not have much real life applications.
Consequently reading the word becomes a religious duty for Christians and the
word loses its power to transform lives.
The skills of interpretation are definitely not natural. In my natural
state, I tend not to rely on commentaries, partly because I believe that I
should be able to figure out everything that God wants to speak from the text
alone, partly because I like the process of figuring out stuff for myself, and
partly also because I’ve never believed that commentaries are necessarily right.
Naturally, I would want to know the context of where a text came from, for the
surrounding passages would definitely change the way we understand the text in
question. However, often I forget that there is a historical context that may
or may not be found in the text, e.g. who the author is, who he is writing to,
the reason for writing the letter, the specific happenings at the time of
writing, and any relevant geographical, historical, political, customs,
ideological information that would change the way we understand the culture of the
original intended audience. Often, I get to impatient in wanting to know what
the text says, that I forget that I do not have enough information to do so and
jump straight into the text.
But at the same time, I have also realized that the stated purpose of why a
book was written in a commentary may not always be correct. Our understanding
of the details in the book may sometimes shape the way we understand the
overall message of the book. And of course, our understanding of the overall
message will affect our understanding of the details in the text. This is
something called the hermeneutical spiral! It’s the process of slowly coming
closer to the intended meaning of the text. (Tate, W. Randolph, Biblical
Interpretation: An Integrated Approach, page 36) Glad there is name for the
phenomenon I’ve been experiencing all along.
One aspect of biblical interpretation, which is probably the most fundamental,
is that we need to be aware of our own pre-understandings, to not see the text
with our tinted lenses of theology, but rather let the text speak for itself. Easier
said than done, but I have experienced how fulfilling reading the bible can be,
especially narratives, when I do so. Try reading the Noah’s Ark flood without
assuming that God is good, but instead see how the story itself shows that God
is gracious through the flood; or not assuming that Abraham is a righteous
person, and see how the text shows that God is again the one who is faithful in
the life of Abraham. At first it may seem as though you are taking one step
back in knowing God, but in letting the text speak for itself, we see that God
is who He says he is. Reading Robert Altar's famous book titled The Art of Biblical Narrative, I am reminded that the author is telling us a message through the narrative, and not merely giving a recount of historical events. If we merely focus on the details, we may miss the message the author is trying to convey. But yet the details in the text, such as the art of repetition, and the art of using dialogue, cannot be missed either as they add to the overall message of the book.
The most important aspect of biblical interpretation is of course the
application of the eternal principles that we gather from reading the text. For
this, it seems that there is no technique to derive deep and meaningful
application points other than spending time reflecting deeply and widely about
the issues of life. Perhaps this is where the Holy Spirit comes in as our counsellor
to guide us into all truth, and the wisdom from God comes to help us apply His
truth into our lives. But we too have a part to play. How much of our lives are
we willing to let the word of God question?
But prove
yourselves doers of the word,
and
not merely hearers
who delude themselves.
For
if anyone is a hearer of the word
and
not a doer,
he is like a man
who looks at his natural face in a mirror;
for
once he has looked at himself
and
gone away,
he has immediately forgotten
what kind of person he was.
But
one who looks intently at the perfect law,
the law of liberty
and
abides by it,
not having become a forgetful hearer
but
an effectual doer,
this man will be blessed in what he does.
(James 1:22-25, NASB)
"If anyone..." is a _____ clause?
ReplyDeleteDependent clause? The word "if" makes it dependent, no?
DeleteOh is it correct to see "for" as a subordinating clause? It seems to be used as "because" or "since".
DeleteYes you are something else man, doing the same module again under the same teacher! Respect. But yes.. similar to you, i don't really do background research cause i believed (past tense) that if God wants us to know, He'll teach us. But i suppose this class teaches us the discipline and the desire of going in depth and not just scratching the surface. Great to work with you again.
ReplyDeleteI really can relate to the view that Christians need to be educated on how to study the word correctly and accurately. One of the factors as to why so many have fallen to the prosperity gospel is because of the lack of accurate theological understanding of the Scripture and we are easily swayed by inaccurate interpretation. We really need discernment and education to help educate Christians and teach them to handle the Word of God correctly. Thanks for your sharing!
ReplyDeleteHi Yan Shao, thanks for the very insightful reflection. You have brought out some very interesting learning points and have interacted well with them in your sharing. I'm thrilled that you still managed to find new learning points despite attending the largely similar lectures for the second time, and I'm glad you have found the various group work and class discussions fruitful. Continue to engage your learning and reflecting about how they are to reshape your perspectives in life and ministry.
ReplyDelete